In a significant development, FKA twigs has decided to withdraw her lawsuit against actor Shia LaBeouf. This decision comes after LaBeouf agreed to nullify a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) that had previously restricted twigs from discussing her experiences of alleged sexual abuse during their relationship.
On October 6, 2026, twigs, whose real name is Tahliah Barnett, announced the withdrawal of her legal action. Her attorney, Mathew Rosengart, emphasized that this move was not just about her personal situation but aimed at supporting a broader cause—advocating for female survivors of sexual violence. Rosengart stated that twigs' actions reflect a commitment to standing up for those who have faced similar experiences.
The backdrop to this lawsuit dates back to 2020 when twigs first accused LaBeouf of various forms of abuse, including physical, sexual, and mental mistreatment. After a lengthy legal process, a jury trial that was scheduled for September 2025 was averted when both parties reached a settlement. However, twigs later filed a new lawsuit, asserting that the settlement included an unlawful NDA that sought to silence her not only regarding her own experiences but also on the broader topic of sexual violence.
Rosengart argued that the NDA violated California's STAND Act, which prohibits agreements designed to suppress the voices of sexual assault survivors. He highlighted that the NDA was an attempt by LaBeouf to evade accountability for his actions and prevent twigs from discussing critical issues surrounding sexual abuse.
In response, LaBeouf's legal representative, Shawn Holley, expressed surprise at twigs' claims, asserting that the settlement was reached through a fair mediation process overseen by a respected mediator. Holley contended that twigs was adequately represented throughout the negotiation and that any allegations of coercion were unfounded.
The recent lawsuit was partly triggered by an arbitration demand from LaBeouf in December 2025, which accused twigs of breaching their settlement agreement after she publicly shared her feelings of insecurity following their relationship. Although this arbitration was dismissed, twigs sought judicial intervention, arguing that the NDA was part of ongoing efforts to silence her as a survivor of abuse.
Rosengart clarified that twigs is not pursuing financial compensation through this legal action. Instead, her motivation is to address what she perceives as a wrong and to advocate for other victims of sexual and domestic violence who may lack the resources to speak out against their abusers.
By dropping the lawsuit, twigs aims to reclaim her voice and encourage discussions about the challenges faced by survivors of sexual violence. Her decision underscores the importance of addressing these issues openly and the need for legal frameworks that protect survivors' rights to speak out without fear of retribution.
No approved comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.